Despite the focus on prevention in the Swedish public dental health, studies have shown that plaque and gingivitis are common among Swedish teenagers. Person-centred educational approaches seem to work on adults – could this also be a tool to get teenagers into healthier oral hygiene habits?
What is a person-centred approach?
Refers to placing a person and their wellbeing at the centre of decision making, and including factors outside the dental office. It emphasizes acknowledging the person's own preferences, emotions, and needs.
Participants - dental hygienists and adolescents
30 dental hygienists (DHs), regularly treating teenagers, from different public dental health clinics in Västra Götaland county, signed up for the study. The dental hygienists were randomised to a test group (16 DHs) or a control group (14 DHs). A total of 312 patients accepted the invitation to be in the study. The inclusion criteria were as follows:
- 16-17 years of age
- Marginal bleeding and/or dental plaque at ≥50 % of tooth surfaces
- No difficulties in understanding and speaking Swedish
Training for the dental hygienists
After randomisation, the dental hygienists in the control group spent half a day of being informed about the study protocol and Good Clinical Practice in research and calibrated regarding clinical assessments. The test group received the same training plus an extra 1.5 days on health behavioural theory, behavioural change techniques, and a communicative approach inspired by motivational interviewing. The DHs practised under the supervision of a psychologist and were also given manuals for further training and support during the study appointments.
Collecting data
Marginal bleeding and plaque were assessed as either present or absent at four sites on each tooth, at baseline and the 6-month follow-up. The patients also answered a questionnaire on the same occasions. The questions covered information about background characteristics, self-rated oral and general health, and frequency of toothbrushing and interdental cleaning.
Interventions
The control group were treated with the “business as usual” philosophy and received conventional information/instructions on one or more occasions, as needed. The test programme followed a specific structure based on cognitive behavioural theory and principles and behavioural change techniques such as goal setting and planning (see figure 1 in the open access article for further explanation). The study participants attended three treatment sessions, 45-60 minutes each, during a period of 10-12 weeks. The dental hygienists used a person-centred and collaborative communication approach inspired by motivational interviewing.
Results
274 out of the 312 patients followed through with the 6-month follow-up. Both groups showed improvements in clinical parameters, but the test group had significantly greater improvements. The self-reported oral hygiene behavioural outcomes were also positive for the test group. The percentage of teenagers in the test group brushing their teeth twice daily was 68.8 % at baseline and 78 % at 6 months. Regarding the frequency of interdental cleaning, 10.1 % of patients in the test group reported cleaning ≥3 times per week at baseline, a number that increased to 20.6 % at 6 months.
So what does this study say about using health behavioural theories, behaviour change techniques, and person-centred communication in practice? It is more effective in improving oral hygiene and periodontal health among teenagers than providing them with instructions and information the conventional way.